Thursday, July 17, 2008

Transmit IMD and voice quality

I've had people tell me regarding one radio or another, "This radio has great IMD numbers compared to others. How can it sound bad?" And usually the number they quote is the third-order IMD product, measured at full power.

How accurately does this IMD measurement reflect, in the real world, how a radio will sound?

Unfortunately, the effect of Transmitter IMD upon perceived voice quality is poorly understood. So we're venturing off on our own into uncharted territory...

First, let's consider the effect of testing IMD at full power. Makes sense, right? But suppose I told you that voice signals have a "crest factor" of somewhere in the order of 9 dB? What does this mean?

Well, "Crest Factor" is the ratio of the peak level to the RMS level. A 9 dB Crest Factor means that quite often our voices are at a level well below peak. Which of course, raises the question, "What's the IMD of my transmitter when my voice power is not at peak, but at, say, 9 dB below? (By the way, for a 100 watt transmitter, 9 dB below peak power of 100 watts would be 12.5 watts.)

Let's say IMD was measured only at peak power (in this example, 100 watts). Now, suppose IMD in our particular transmitter worsens as power is decreased from 100 watts. Given what we know of the crest factor of voice signals, an IMD measurement made only at peak power will give a falsely positive indication of how the transmitter sounds.

So doesn't it make sense that IMD should be measured not only at peak power, but at lower powers, too? Personally, I recommend making IMD measurements at 4 different power levels: Max power and then at powers that are 3, 6, and 9 dB below max power. For a 100 watt transmitter these four measurement points would be at: 100, 50, 25, and 12.5 watts. I believe this will give a truer picture of how a transmitter will sound in comparison to others.

Another problem with IMD measurements is that they're often stated solely in terms of the 3rd-order product (that is, the product just to either side of the two-tones used in the test, when viewed on a Spectrum Analyzer). I've discovered that defining transmitter quality with only the 3rd-order product of IMD is not sufficient in determining how a transmitter will sound. For example, here are two different IMD plots:





























(You can enlarge either image by clicking on it.)

The first plot is my 5000 at 0.1 watts. The second is the same transmitter at 100 watts.

Note how, in both plots, the third-order products are essentially at the same level relative to the two-tone test tones. Yet, these two transmitters sound different. The difference is subtle, yet it's there. And if you look at the images, it's obvious why there's a difference: it's because, at 100 watts, the higher-order distortion products are present, too.

[You can listen to a comparison of these two tests and judge for yourself. Send an email to jca1955 "at" sbcglobal.net, and ask me for the "Flex 100W vs 0.1W test," and I'll send you the mp3 file. The first half of the recording is the 5000 at 0.1 watts, and the second half is at 100 watts.]

No comments: